Does Mike Pence's face show dark secrets eating away at him?

Young Mike Pence 

Hello everyone! We were just checking our archives and noticed we haven't written about Vice President Mike Pence since July. So we felt it was time to go knock old Mikey down a few pegs. As frequent readers of this blog are aware we have pointed out how the supernaturally dark circles under Governor Eric Holcomb's eyes denote the darkness in his cold, black heart.

Well a reader of this blog found something on Twitter about Mike Pence's change in appearance over the years. Speculation is the change in his facial features might be due to some dark secrets he is carrying around in his nonexistent brain. Here is the tweet and some responses. We will post them and you can all decide what if anything the pictures show:

Lincoln's Bible @LincolnsBible

What dark secrets are slowly sucking Pence's eyes back into his skull?

7:35 PM · Sep 12, 2017

Alexander McKinlay @Ajohms1956

Replying to @LincolnsBible

They're trying to fill that void in his head which, in a normal person, would be home to a fully functioning brain.

7:48 PM · Sep 12, 2017

Sparky @avittorio6·25m

Replying to @LincolnsBible and @dawnresist

I noticed that today, too. Maybe he just sucks from the inside out?

Kris Mares @KrisMares2

Replying to @LincolnsBible

The devil ate his soul.

7:36 PM · Sep 12, 2017

Cynthia Conciatu @CynthiaConciatu·26m

Replying to @LincolnsBible

Hypocrisy will do that to a person.

Link to above tweet: https://twitter.com/LincolnsBible/status/907749483773026304

Under Fire Todd Rokita writes OP-ED vowing he will "Defeat the Elite"

Todd Rokita pretending to have balls!

All of us at INDY REPUBLICAN know by now we maybe sounding like a broken record when it comes to Todd Rokita. But him being such an easy target we just can't resist! 

It appears that all of the negative attention that Todd has been receiving has gotten his attention. Today he wrote an article for the Langley-Controlled Indianapolis Star attempting to show Hoosiers how awesome he is. Here are some extracts from his humbly titled OP-ED "In Senate, I will defeat the elite":

Since announcing for Senate under the slogan of “Defeat the Elite”, I’ve been attacked by the Republican and Democrat establishment, liberal Joe Donnelly and his Washington allies, and liberal news columnists who still don’t get it. 

“Defeat the Elite” isn’t about taking on people who are wealthy or successful.  Achieving success through hard work is part of the American Dream.  We should celebrate and encourage that success.

It is, however, about taking on the political status quo perpetuated by many in the professional political class in Washington, D.C., who only look out for themselves.  It’s people who think they know better than you do what’s best for you and your family.

It's interesting to us that Congressman Rokita does not choose to answer the criticism against him for his shabby treatment of those who work for him as we reported on here. Or some interesting questions that have been raised about alleged misconduct while he was Indiana Secretary of State  or even rumors involving his private life click here.

If he really seeks to defeat the elite, then he should welcome the opportunity to show how he is not just another useless politician. When he mentions that he has been attacked by "news columnists who don't get it". We can't help but wonder if Mr. Rokita is not referring to IR. If so we are thrilled that he has read us. And if what we have all written here has upset him. We are overjoyed to hear that!

Keep up the good work Todd! At this rate you will be unemployed after next years primary!

Mitt Romney may run for the US Senate. Would someone tell Mitt to go the Hell away!

Mitt Romney 

The rumor mill is abuzz with reports that former Massachusetts Governor and 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee Mitt Romney will run for Utah Senator Orrin Hatch's seat in Utah if Senator Hatch does not seek reelection next year.

Jack Crowe of The Daily Caller has the story:

Romney has yet to publicly commit to a Senate run, but he has reportedly decided to run in the event that Hatch steps down after his seventh term, two sources close to Romney told Utah Policy.

Hatch, 83, remains undecided about his future political career, but has said that he will run for his eighth term contingent on the continued good health of himself and his wife. Hatch likely won’t make a final decision on whether to run in 2018 until December, effectively preventing a field of challengers from assembling, according to Utah Policy.

While Hatch hasn’t made a final determination on the 2018 race, he indicated in March he would be willing to step aside if an “outstanding person” such as Romney were to run.

All of IR is praying to God that Governor Romney decides not to run for the Senate next year. After seeing him in the national spotlight for the better part of a decade. We are all more than ready to see him ride off into the sunset!

Anti-Elite Todd Rokita's Meeting the Elite!

Todd Rokita

It seems that man of the people Todd Rokita just can't seem to catch a break. In last Friday's Indianapolis Star September 1, 2017 Brian Slodysko reported more on Congressman and Senate Candidate Todd Rokita's management style both as a Congressman and former Indiana Secretary of State. IR recently reported on Todd Rokita's treatment of his drivers here. We are curious to see what other insights are to be gleaned about a man who desires to be a United States Senator. Also we will be delving a little bit more into some aspects of good old Todd's background that he would perhaps prefer people avoid. But as Mr. Rokita is seeking an office of great public trust. And as his allies have seen fit to start off by using scorched earth tactics against his Senate Primary opponent Congressman Luke Messer. We shall see if Rokita can take it as well as dish it out.

Brian Slodysko reporting for the Associated Press writes:

Staffers in tears. Pay cuts for small mistakes. Aides who walked out of the office — and never came back.

Working for four-term Republican Rep. Todd Rokita of Indiana is an exacting job with long hours, made more difficult by a boss known for micromanaging and yelling at his staff, according to 10 former aides who spoke to The Associated Press.

All but one of the former staffers spoke on the condition of anonymity out of concern of retribution from the congressman. They include five former congressional staffers, three who worked for Rokita when he was Indiana’s secretary of state and two who worked on his political campaigns.

But even in Congress, where ambition and ego can go hand-in-hand, Rokita’s behavior is outside the norm, according to the former aides, most of whom have worked for other elected officials.

“Todd’s a hard boss to work for. He’s got some staff turnover issues,” said Tony Will, who was a constituent service representative for Rokita for nearly three years. “But he is a very hard worker.”

One moment Rokita could charm at a GOP fundraiser. The next he would belittle his aides or question their competence over the route they took to the next event, or their choice of parking spot, three former staffers said. Some say he turned angry over small details, like the kind of letterhead used on office or campaign documents.

A Jasper County teacher asked Rokita to leave his high school civics class in November 2016 after a talk that was supposed to be about the Constitution got off on the wrong foot, according to two students.

Rokita had asked the class if they were taught about “American Exceptionalism.” But when a number of students seemed puzzled by the concept, he had a testy exchange with their teacher, Paul Norwine, whom he criticized for not including it in the curriculum, the students said.

“Mr. Rokita got very angry and said, ‘You have an American congressman in your class, what are you doing?’” said Marcus Kidwell, 19, a Donald Trump supporter who was a senior at the time. “He seems like a pretty hot-headed guy. That disappointed me because he’s a Republican and I was pretty excited to meet him.”

A review of records maintained by the Congress-tracking website Legistorm shows the rate of turnover in Rokita’s office is roughly double that of his fellow Indiana Republicans in the congressional delegation. The analysis excludes temporary workers, interns or employees who are shared by multiple members of Congress.

At least two staffers were fired after they said they intended to quit, according to three people with direct knowledge of the firings. Rokita also docked the pay of at least two congressional aides for mistakes, like a minor error in a news release, according to three former aides with knowledge of the actions. Another two staffers simply walked out on the job, according to four former aides.

Mr. Slodysko's citing that Rokita has a much higher staff turnover rate than Indiana's other congressmen lends credence to the allegations that Rokita has a problem managing his staff. If Rokita does have such a huge problem managing his own staff than one has to question his suitability to be a senator. Also for a man who claims to not be an elitist, his attitude towards his workers is confusing. Tony Cook wrote a piece for the Indianapolis Star on August 24th, 2017 titled "Indiana's anti-elite Senate candidate Todd Rokita to hold swanky California fundraiser". 

Here are some excerpts from Tony Cook's article:

U.S. Senate candidate Todd Rokita, the Indiana congressman running on an anti-elite campaign theme, is holding a swanky fundraiser in California next week.

An invitation to the Aug. 30 event  requests contributions as high as $5,400 — the maximum allowed for federal elections — and the luncheon will be held at Wayfare Tavern, a restaurant founded in 2010 by celebrity chef Tyler Florence of Food Network fame.

"With the news of Rokita's list of rules for chauffeurs and now this exclusive California fundraiser, maybe Congressman Rokita should change his catch phrase to 'meet the elite,'" said Jason Kneeland, a Messer campaign advisor.

Our staff in the course of our research came across two interesting observations made about Todd Rokita by the late great Gary Welsh on his Advance Indiana blog back in 2006. We thought we would share them with you all. 

Welsh wrote the following about Todd Rokita in 2006: "Rokita, who formerly lived in a downtown condo above a gay video store on Massachusetts Avenue as a bachelor, recently moved to Pike Township after getting married last year."

Gary Welsh also had this to say about both then State Senator Brent Waltz and Todd Rokita: "There are those among us who think that Rokita and Waltz have a distinctive similarity, but their OUTward appearance is not one of them."

We are not sure if Gary was privy to some information about Todd Rokita and former State Senator Brent Waltz's private lives or not. But based off of rumors that all of us have heard over the years about Waltz and Rokita. It wouldn't surprise anyone here if Gary was onto something about these guys. 

Cowardly Indiana Supreme Court Claims They Cannot order Indiana Department of Child Services to Obey the Law Time for a real investigation into DCS w/update

Yesterday the Indiana State Supreme Court continued their sad history of abrogating there duties to Hoosiers. And proceeded to allow the Department of Child Services (DCS) to violate the law and to shirk there responsibilities to make sure children are not horribly murdered as Tajanay Bailey was back in 2007.

Marisa Kwiatkowski wrote in this mornings issue of the Indianapolis Star about yesterday's decision by the State Supreme Court. In her article Ms. Kwiatkowski writes: 

The Indiana Supreme Court said it cannot force the Indiana Department of Child Services to comply with caseload limits — even though those limits are required by law.

The decision stems from a suit brought by a DCS family case manager, who argued she and other workers were handling heavy workloads that put children at risk.

The lawsuit, brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, sought to force DCS to reduce the caseloads handled by its workers, who investigate allegations of abuse and neglect and manage ongoing child welfare cases.

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court said the issue can't be resolved by a judicial mandate. The justices said that while Indiana law requires a specific outcome — limits on the number of cases each family case manager must handle — the law does not specify the particular action DCS must take to reach that outcome.

The ACLU sued DCS and its director in 2015 on behalf of Mary Price and all other family case managers employed by the state agency.

Price was handling 43 ongoing cases when the lawsuit was filed. Indiana law requires family case managers to handle no more than 17 ongoing cases or 12 initial assessments.

DCS its family case managers as the "backbone" of efforts to protect Indiana youth.

As of state fiscal year 2016, only one of the 19 DCS regions — the agency’s central office — was in compliance with the caseload standard, state records show.

Ken Falk, legal director of ACLU Indiana, said Price and the ACLU of Indiana are "obviously very disappointed" by the Supreme Court's decision. More importantly, he said, family case managers still have too many children to manage.

"This is something everyone in the state of Indiana should be concerned about," Falk said. "There's a problem here that still hasn't been solved, and we'll need to see if there's other ways to resolve it."

INDY REPUBLICAN has read the court decision and it just seems as to be another example of the Court resorting to mental gymnastics to justify a bullshit decision. The justices on the court are certainly aware that DCS has been involved in questionable activities over the last decade. Ms. Kwiatkowski has written a fine article. As many of you know DCS has a long and troubled history. You may remember we previously noted former Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi's backing away from investigating the tragic death of  three year old Tajanay Bailey in 2007. 

Woman holding a photo of the murdered Tajanay Bailey

Both Paul Ogden and the late Gary Welsh have both written about Carl Brizzi's unusual handling of Tajanay Bailey's murder, and the questionable by DCS in this matter.  The Indiana Systemic Thinking blog has also written extensively on Tajanay Bailey click here for that blogs posts on the matter . Writing in 2010 in his article "Carl Brizzi and the Tajanay Bailey Case". Gary Welsh suggested a that Brizxi may have decided to drop his investigation into Tajanay's murder in exchange for ownership in a building being leased by DCS. Gary Welsh wrote at the time: 

Many of you will recall the tragic killing of 3-year-old Tajanay Bailey in November, 2007. She was beaten to death by her mother's live-in boyfriend at the troubled Phoenix Apartments where she and her mother lived. Subsequent new stories told a troubling tale of how case workers for the Indiana Department of Child Services had badly failed in their mission to protect children like Tajanay. According to a story in the Indianapolis Star, Marion Co. Prosecutor Carl Brizzi expressed deep concern about DCS's handling of the case and promised a complete and full investigation. Specifically, Brizzi wanted to know why DCS officials had failed to notify police after they learned Tajanay had been physically abused in the home in 2006 and why she had been returned to that same home. At the time Brizzi made those comments, Tajanay's tragic killing was all over the news. As time passed, we never heard from Brizzi again about DCS.

We now know that DCS entered into a lease agreement with L&BAB LLC in 2008 to lease a 13,000 square foot building for $248,500 a year that the business had acquired in Elkhart, Indiana only five months after the company purchased the building in February, 2008 and just three months after Brizzi said he planned to investigate DCS' handling of the Tajanay Bailey case. According to the IBJ, the 50-50 owners of L&BAB are Carl Brizzi and Paul Page. Brizzi was not required to pay anything to L&BAB for his 50 percent stake in the company. The deal raised eyebrows of many people in the legal community, largely because Page represented a number of criminal defense clients adverse to Brizzi's office at the time and other questions have been raised about whether Brizzi cut favors for Page's clients. Did the investigation of DCS' handling of the Tajanay Bailey case suffer because of the business deal Brizzi and his partner struck with the agency? It's a fair question to ask in light of recent disclosures about decisions his office has made.

Paul Ogden's 2011 article "Was Brizzi's Decision to Drop Investigation of DCS Following Infant's Death Connected to His Becoming DCS's Landlord Months Later?" over at Ogden On Politics.com covers the possibility of a corrupt bargain to get Carl Brizzi to back away from looking into DCS:

According to my sources, Prosecutor Brizzi's decision to investigate DCS was met with fierce resistance by officials in state government, including Governor Daniels himself who reportedly was furious with Brizzi's public announcement that the intended to investigate DCS and its head, former Marion County Judge Jim Payne.  The planned investigation went nowhere.

Three months later, in February of 2008, Brizzi became a 50% silent owner of a building in Elkhart, an ownership acquired without putting any money up for purchase.  Five months later, Brizzi and Attorney Paul Page became landlord of DCS as the agency rented the Elkhart space for an office.  Issues behind that deal has led Page, another attorney, and real estate developer John Bales to be indicted last week by a federal jury.

Was there a connection between the decision by Brizzi to drop the investigation of DCS and his later becoming the landlord for tenant DCS in a deal in which he did not have to put up any ownership of the building?   If so, the people involved could well be charged with obstruction of justice.

It is possible that Brizzi decided to not press forward with the investigation because of a lack of evidence DCS did anything wrong, at least criminally.  However, a later investigation by the Indianapolis Star, reported in May of 2010, suggests DCS almost certainly failed in its responsibility to protect Bailey:

The Indianapolis Star has obtained documents that reveal the Department of Child Services placed 11-week-old Destiny Linden with a foster family even after an advocate warned the agency about the care and safety of other foster children in the home. 

A week later, Destiny was dead.

She was placed with the family in April, five months after DCS was accused of ignoring warnings prior to the death of TaJanay Bailey -- a 3-year-old fatally beaten in November after DCS returned the toddler to her mother and the woman's boyfriend.

In both cases, it was an advocate who watches out for the best interests of children in state care who raised the red flags.

According to a report written by the advocate, Destiny's foster parents, Everett and Kimberly Coleman, did little to supervise children in their care, including leaving them to prepare their own meals and failing to treat a child burned while ironing clothes. The advocate specifically recommended that all children be removed from the home. But DCS continued placing children, including Destiny, in the foster home and even increased the number of children the couple were licensed to care for in early April.

The advocate who raised concerns about the Colemans -- just like the advocate in TaJanay's case -- was so unsatisfied with DCS' response that she turned to the courts in hopes of persuading a judge to order the removal of the children.

In both cases, the child died before the courts could act -- and in each instance, DCS workers insisted after the children's deaths that they were not made aware of the full extent of the advocates' concerns. 

One other fact the cases share: There has been no independent investigation of the agency's actions.

Was that "independent investigation" of DCS that Brizzi promised diverted by the Elkhart lease deal with DCS?

"Quid Pro Quo" Carl Brizzi?

The former head of DCS Judge Jim Payne was later implicated in a scandal dealing with DCS's handling of a case involving Judge Payne's grandchildren in 2012. Paul Ogden and Gary Welsh have both written about this. Click here and here for their articles.

Judge Jim "I Should be Locked Up" Payne

The time has long since come for DCS's reign of terror to end! Justice is calling. The Tajanay Bailey case needs to be solved, and Carl Brizzi and James Payne need to be driven out of town if not thrown in prison! 

UPDATE: A fan of the blog had this to say about the State Supreme Courts decision: "It's utterly ridiculous. You have a law that specifically requires certain caseloads to be below a certain level. And the Supreme Court says there's no way to enforce that law. Makes you scratch your head why the legislature would pass it to begin with if there was no way to enforce it."

So once again we here will place our faith in the INDY REPUBLICAN mailbag.

Fake Republican Governor Eric "Taxman" Holcomb Strikes Again

Governor Eric Holcomb RINO-Ninth Circle of Hell

Pray as we all do that Governor "Bagman" Holcomb will decide to stop being a traitor to the historic principles of Republicanism. Mad Old Eric just can't resist trying to squeeze citizens and voters for more money. Holly Hayes over at the Indianapolis Star with contributions from Kaitlin Lange reports that Governor Holcomb wants to get the United States Supreme Court to overturn a 1992 SCOTUS decision so that he can force out of state businesses to pay tribute to collect and give sales taxes to the State of Indiana.

Ms. Hayes has the story:

Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill filed a lawsuit on behalf of the state Monday asking a court to find one of Indiana's newest laws constitutional. 

House Enrolled Act 1129, which went into effect July 1, would require out-of-state businesses to collect and remit the same sales taxes as Indiana-based businesses, according to a news release.

The lawsuit "seeks to level the playing field" between Indiana businesses and out-of-state businesses conducting business online.

In a statement released Monday night, Gov. Eric Holcomb called for the United States Supreme Court to overturn its 1992 ruling that out-of-state retails not collect and remit sales and use taxes.

"In light of the rapid evolution and capabilities of software and technology, the incredible growth of online sales in recent years and other factors, it’s time for the Supreme Court to revisit and overturn this ruling," Holcomb said. "Hoosier-based businesses need the ability to compete on a level playing field as soon as possible."

Holcomb signed the law with full knowledge of SCOTUS' prior decision. The law includes a provision that the state legally challenge that ruling.

It looks a lot like Holcomb is just grandstanding and praying that the Supreme Court will overturn their earlier decision from 1992. IR wonders if Governor Holcomb is aware that the Supreme Court hears less than 1% of the cases sent to it each year. And even should they hear the case and rule in the states favor. That will take years. For a "fiscal conservative" Eric Holcomb certainly loves tax money! After all he signed over 45 tax and user fee hikes into law earlier this year! Tell us all again. Why is Eric Holcomb a Republican? If he is going to raise taxes all the time he and the Daniels-Oesterle-RINO wing of the Indiana Republican Party needs to take a hike!